Preview

Vestnik Majkopskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tehnologiceskogo Universiteta

Advanced search

To the problem of linguistic affiliation of the bearers of multirolled ceramic culture

https://doi.org/0.47370/2078-1024-2022-14-1-13-21

Abstract

At this stage of archaeological and anthropological research, a consensus of opinions has developed regarding the course of the historical process in the Black Sea steppes in the Bronze Age. Thanks to this, it has become possible not only to determine the origin and genetic relationships of individual archaeological cultures, but also to resolve the problem of the ethnolinguistic affiliation of the bearers of these cultures. The purpose of the research is a comprehensive analysis of the available data of linguistics, glottochronology, mythology, archeology, anthropology and paleogenetics in order to formulate a hypothesis of linguistic attribution of the culture of multi-rolled ceramics. After determining the linguistic affiliation of the carriers of the culture of multi-rolled ceramics, a private task was to trace the historical fate of the identified dialects until the release of their carriers to modern habitats.

The main method chosen was a retrospective deepening from the culture of multi-rolled ceramics to its origins and alleged ancestors. From the point of view of archeology and anthropology, the ancestors of the carriers of the culture of multi-rolled ceramics turn out to be the Zhivatilovo-Volchanskaya filiation of the Trypillian culture. Together with the inhabitants of Mikhailovka II, they have a genetic connection with the urban-Kasperovkaya group of the Trypillian culture. Since the Yamniks of Mikhailovka II are more or less reliably attributed as Satem Indo-Iranians, we have come the key conclusion, defining the own place of the carriers of the culture of multi-rolled ceramics in the system of areal-dialect divergence of the Indo-European language family, that they themselves and their Zhivtilovo-Volchan ancestors spoke archaic the Kafir dialects, characterized by the absence of palatalization of the phonetic series.

About the Author

Konstantin Alexandrovich Alekseev
FSBEI HE "The Russian State University named after A. N. Kosygin"
Russian Federation

Alekseev Konstantin Alexandrovich, Candidate of Philosophy, an associate professor, a branch of FSBEI HE "The Russian State University named after A. N. Kosygin"

Tver

tel.: +7 (996) 347 39 24



References

1. Alekseev K.A. Areal-dialect divergence of the eastern branch of the Indo-European family (integral review) // Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: History and political sciences. 2021. No. 3. P. 131-145.

2. Gamkrelidze T.V., Ivanov V.V. The Indo-European language and the Indo-Europeans: in 2 books. Tbilisi, 1984. 1330 p.

3. Gindin L.A. Population of Homeric Troy. Historical and philological research on the ethnology of the Ancient Anatolia. M., 1993. 210 p.

4. Kozintsev A.G. On the early migrations of the representatives of European race to Siberia and the Central Asia // Archeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Eurasia. 2009. No. 4 (40). P. 125-136.

5. Korobkova G.F., Shaposhnikova O.G. The Mikhailovka settlement is a reference monument of the ancient pit culture. SPb., 2005. 316 p.

6. Kotova N.S. The Dereivskaya culture and the monuments of the Nizhnemikhailovsky type. Kiev; Kharkov, 2013. 486 p.

7. Kruts S.I. To the question of the anthropological composition of the population of the catacomb culture in the Northern Black Sea region // Problems of studying the catacomb cultural-historical community. Zaporozhye, 1990. P. 41-43.

8. Kuzmina E.E. Arias: the way to the south. M., 2008. 557 p.

9. Masson V.M. The Central Asia // History of Humanity. V. 2. M.: UNESCO, 2003. P. 405-414.

10. Sequencing of the complete mitochondrial genome of an ancient man, a representative of the Novosvobodnaya culture / Nedoluzhko A.V. [et al.] // Acta Naturae. 2014. V. 6, No. 2 (21). P. 34-39.

11. Rassamakin Yu.Ya. Kvityanskaya culture: history and current state of the problem // Stratum plus. 2002. No. 2. P. 117-177.

12. Rysin M.B. Cultural transformation and culture of dolmen builders in the Caucasus // Ancient societies of the Caucasus in the era of paleometal. SPb., 1997. P. 85-123.

13. Safronov V. A. The Indo-European homelands. Gorky, 1989. 400 p.

14. Trifonov V.A. The origin of the ceramic complex of the "dolmen" culture of the Bronze Age // Proceedings of the III (XIX) All-Russian Archaeological Congress. V. 1. M.; SPb.; N. Novgorod, 2011. P. 289-291.

15. Shaposhnikova O.G., Fomenko V.N., Dovzhenko N.D. The Yamnaya cultural-historical region (the South-Bugsky variant). Kiev, 1986. 160 p.

16. Brandt G. Bestandig ist nur der Wandel! Die Rekonstruktion der Besiedelungsgeschichte Europas wahrend des Neolithikums mittels palao- und populationsgenetischer Verfahren: Dissertation. Mainz, 2014. 367 p.

17. A genomic Neolithic time transect of hunter-farmer admixture in central Poland / Fernandes D.M. [et al.] // PubMedCentral. 2018. 5 Oct.


Review

For citations:


Alekseev K.A. To the problem of linguistic affiliation of the bearers of multirolled ceramic culture. Vestnik Majkopskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tehnologiceskogo Universiteta. 2022;(1):13-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/0.47370/2078-1024-2022-14-1-13-21

Views: 142


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-1024 (Print)