Revisiting the relationship between the principle of benevolence and beneficence

The relevance of the research is substantiated by the fact that the principles of the educational process are almost always interconnected in their essence. However, usually a separate principle is taken as a basis, while establishing the relationship between the principles of benevolence and beneficence contributes to a much deeper understanding of the dialectics of educational interactions.

The problem statement: without a sense of benevolence and beneficence, learners are less likely to be interested in thinking and acting in ways that meet the needs of others.

The goal of the research is to analyze contemporary literature to identify the relationship between the principle of benevolence and beneficence, which should encourage young people to know about the lives of other people and specific circumstances.

The object of research is the principles of benevolence and beneficence as humanitarian prerequisites for the moral process, and the subject is the education of the individual on this basis.

The research method is conceptual analysis. A detailed examination of the presented concepts, which forms a clear idea of their essence and content, deserves special attention in this work.

The conclusions: in order to understand what exactly contributes to the formation of a basis for familiarity with different points of view and worldviews, as well as with the structural causes of social problems and the potential consequences of actions taken to solve them, aspects for the emergence of these principles were considered. Also, during a detailed study of materials devoted to this issue, the principle of justice and charity has been discovered and described in the context of the connection between benevolence and beneficence. It has been noted that the use of the principle of benevolence and beneficence, considering age characteristics, can become one of the foundations in determining the mechanisms for implementing the continuity of teacher education.

The results of the study can be used not only in training teachers, but can also be useful for specialists in the field of psychology, culture, etc.

1. Agafonova S.V., Bryukhova N.G., Kajgorodov B.V. Goodwill as a moral quality of student volunteer. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology. 2023. Vol. 11, No. 2. 14PSMN223. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24158/fik.2022.8.31 (In Russ).

2. Betilmerzaeva M.M. Ethnic Identity as a Factor of Formation Cilvic Identy. Society: Philosophy, History, Culture. 2022. No. 8. P. 193-197. Available from: doi:10.24158/fik.2022.8.31 (In Russ).

3. Cultural conditionality of the social identity structure among students studying in the multicultural university environment / Bokhan T.G. [et al.] // World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology. 2020. No. 8. Available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/17PSMN120.pdf (In Russ).

4. Gerasimenko T.I. Main factors in the transformation of regional and ethnic identity. South of Russia: ecology, development.2020. Vol. 15? Issue 3. P. 144-154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2020-3-144-154

5. Gokina A.G., Safonova E.V., Iagafova E.A. The ethnocultural aspect in the educational process of a pedagogical university // Samara Journal of Science. 2023. Vol. 12,Issue 1. P. 256-261. (In Russ). DOI: 10.55355/snv2023121304.

6. Zazaeva N.B., Fedyunina S.M. Main trends in the digital space formation of Russian corporate philanthropy. Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration. 2021. Vol. 21. Issue 6. P. 92-101. (In Russ). DOI: 10.22394/1682-2358-2021-6-92-101.

7. Identichnost’: Lichnost’, obschestvo, politika. Entsiklopedicheskoe izdanie. [Identity: Personality, society, politics. Encyclopedic publication] / Ed. By I.S. Semenenko. M.: Ves’Mir, 2017. 992 p. (In Russ).

8. Konopleva N.A., Masterenko V.S. Values and meanings of charity activity // Values and Meanings. 2022. № 1(83). P. 131-146. (In Russ).

9. Maksimova D.I. Information and communication aspect of the corporation's charitable activities // Communicology: electronic scientific journal. 2020. № 5(3). P. 8-18. (In Russ).

10. Miliukova T.V. Ethno-cultural identity as an indicator of the formation of future psychologists’professional readiness for multicultural interaction. Pedagogy. Theory&Practise. 2023. Vol. 8, Iss. 6. P. 648-655. (In Russ).

11. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Adamyan A.A. The ability to forgive and the home environment as aspects of interpersonal interaction // Social psychology and society. 2020. Vol. 11, Issue 1. P. 193-210. (In Russ). DOI: 10.17759/sps.2020110112

12. Romanova S.A., Gurova O.S. Categorial Image Structure of Their Ethnic Community Member in Modern Russian Students. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020. Vol. 22, Issue2. P. 463-470. (In Russ.) DOI: https: // doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2020-22-2-463-470

13. Ryzhova S.V. Ethnic identity in the social dimension. Sociologicheskaja nauka and social’naja praktika. 2020. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 165 – 181. (In Russ). DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2020.8.3.7497

14. Safonova E.V. Ethnocultural technologies of teaching in professional teacher training // Goryukhinskie readings. Science, methodology, culture: materials of the all-Russian scientific-methodological conference with international participation (Novosibirsk, April 23-24, 2021) Iss. II / ed.by O.A. Farafonova. Novosibirsk: NGPU Publishing House, 2022. P.112-117. (In Russ).

15. Smirnov S.N. Charity in the consumer society: the Russia’s case // Social Novelties and Social Sciences. 2023. № 2. P. 60-75. (In Russ).

16. Avant L.C, Swetz K.M. Revisiting beneficence: what is a ‘Benefit’, and by what criteria? // Am J Bioeth. 2020. Vol. 20, Issue 3. P. 75-7. (In Russ). doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1714808.

17. McKenzie J.E, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews / Page M.J. [et al.] // Syst reviews. 2021. Vol. 10, № Iss.1. P. 1-11. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.

18. Nora C.R.D., Junges J.R. Patient safety and ethical aspects: scoping review // Revista Bioética. 2021. № 29. P. 304-316. doi: 10.1590/1983-80422021292468.