Integrated process-project model of functioning of a secondary comprehensive educational organization
https://doi.org/10.47370/2078-1024-2025-17-2-81-98
Abstract
Introduction. Management of a modern secondary comprehensive educational organization requires an integrated approach that combines stability, flexibility, and innovation. Integration of fundamental approaches to management necessitates solving the problem of organic combination of two fundamentally different management paradigms – a stable process approach and a dynamic project method. The synthesis of process and project methods of managing an educational organization is characterized by the presence of a set of interrelated organizational and managerial contradictions that require a systemic solution. The solution to the problem of implementing the process-project approach in the management of an educational organization is associated with the development of an integrated management model taking into account the specifics of management concepts. The goal of the research is to form an integrated process-project model of educational organization management.
The materials and methods. In preparing the article scientifically substantiated materials were used: articles in peer-reviewed journals on process and project management, hybrid models, monographs and collective works on management in education. The study used such theoretical methods as systems analysis, comparative analysis, matrix and mathematical modeling.
The Research results. Analysis of the content of the matrix process-project model and conceptual description of mathematical models of educational organization management has made it possible to form an integrated process-project model of the educational organization functioning. Discussion and conclusion. Comparison of the basic characteristics of the approaches allows us to get an idea of the advantages of their integration, to formulate the principles of creating a balanced system of educational organization management. The basic components of the model include a set of matrix models, as well as mathematical models of process and project management.
About the Authors
V. I. Zarubin
Maуkop State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir I. Zarubin, Dr Sci. (Econ.), Professor
385000, Maikop, 191 Pervomayskaya St.
I. V. Andreeva
Maikop Gymnasium No. 22
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina V. Andreeva, Director
385000, Maikop, 10 Deputatskaya St.
References
1. Titov S.A., Titova N.V. Hybrid project management methodologies as a manifestation of organizational ambidexterity. Management Sciences. 2022;12(2):55-67. DOI: 10.26794/2304-022X2022-12-2-55-67. [In Russ.]
2. Antonov A.A. Trends in the Use of Agile Methodologies in Modern Russia [Electronic resource] // Economy and Paradigm of the New Time. 2023. No. 3. Access mode: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ tendentsii-ispolzovaniya-agile-metodologiy-v-sovremennoy-rossii/viewer. [access date: 10.04.2025]. [In Russ.]
3. Prokopenko S.E. Modern models of management in educational organizations: conference proceedings // Issues of science and education: new approaches and current research: materials of the II All-Russian scientific and practical conference (Cheboksary, October 11, 2023). Cheboksary: Interactive plus, 2023. P. 95-97. [In Russ.]
4. Komzolov P.V. Approaches to the management of multidisciplinary educational complexes [Electronic resource] // Young scientist. 2016. No. 3 (107). Pp. 859-861. URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/107/25631/ (access date: 04/21/2025). [In Russ.]
5. Pokosovskaya O.V. Multifunctional educational organization: a model of effective resource management in the conditions of the information and educational environment (Education Strategy) // Standards and monitoring in education. 2015. No. 3. P. 3-8. [In Russ.]
6. Vikhman V.V., Romm M.V. “Digital Twins” in Education: Prospects and Reality // Higher Education in Russia. 2021. Vol. 30, No. 2. P. 22-32. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-2-22-32. [In Russ.]
7. Skopina I.V. Digital Transformation of Administrative Management in Schools and Universities // Modern Management Technologies. 2025. No. 1. Publication date: 08.01.2025. Access mode: sovman. ru. (date of access: 21.04.2025) [In Russ.]
8. Zheregelya A.V. Features of Managing a Modern Organization in the Implementation of a Digital Transformation Strategy // University Bulletin. 2023 No. 1 P. 5-13. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2023-1-5-13. [In Russ.]
9. Crompton H., Burke D. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: State of the Industry // Int. J. Educ Technol High Educ. 2023. No. 22. DOI: doi.org.
10. Vorobyova S.V. Management of Educational Systems: Textbook and Workshop for Universities. 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. Moscow: Yurait, 2025. 491 p. (Higher education). [In Russ.]
11. Popov V.N., Kasyanov V.S., Savchenko I.P. Systems Analysis in Management: Study Guide. Moscow: KnoRus, 2023. 297 p. book.ru (date of access: 29.04.2025). [In Russ.]
12. Petrov M.N. Evolution and directions of development of the project management paradigm // Economy: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 2017. Vol. 7. No. 2A. P. 210-221. ISSN: 2222-9167. [In Russ.]
13. Efendiev B.A. Development and functioning of adaptive management systems of the organization [Electronic resource] // Russian entrepreneurship. 2008. Vol. 9, No. 11. P. 21-https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razrabotka-i-funktsionirovanie-adaptivnyh-sistem-pravleniya-organizatsiey (date of access: 29.04.2025). [In Russ.]
14. Krikushenko M.V. The Importance of Hybrid Management in the Field of Effective Project Activities of Executive Authorities // State and Municipal Administration. Scientific Notes. 2023. No. 4. P. 261-268. DOI: 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2025.02.09.004 [In Russ.]
15. Poghosyan I. PRINCE2 Agile and its Practical Implementation at Company “X” [Electronic resource]. PM World Journal, Vol. XII, issue XI, November. Access mode: https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/pmwj135-Nov2023-Poghosyan-Prince2-Agile-and-its-practicalimplementation-on-company-X. [In Russ.]
16. Kharlamov I.V., Butkevich A.S. Systems approach: synergy of process and project approaches // INNOVATIONS AND INVESTMENTS. 2023. No. 7. P. 68-71. DOI 10.18334/ide.4.3.119237 [In Russ.]
17. Baranskaya A.N. Process and project approaches in strategic management of organizations of the innovative economy [Electronic resource] // Creative economy. 2010. Vol. 4, No. 12. P. 130-135. Access mode: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15341426 (date of access: 21.04.2025). [In Russ.]
18. Sharp J.H., Lang G. Agile in Teaching and Learning: Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda [Electronic resuorse] // Journal of Information Systems Education. 2018. Vol. 29.No. 2. P. 45-52. URL: jise.org. (date of access: 21.04.2025).
19. Petersen K. Is lean agile and agile lean?: a comparison between two software development paradigms. In A. Dogru & V. Biçer (Eds.), Modern [Electronic resuorse] // Software Engineering Concepts and Practices: Advanced Approaches. 2011. P. 19-46. IGI Global. URL: igi-global.com. (date of access: 21.04.2025).
20. Starkey L. Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2012. DOI: 10.4324/9780203117422.
21. Graham C.R. Emerging practice and research in blended learning // Handbook of Distance Education. 2019. P. 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_68. (date of access: 21.04.2025).
22. Bush T. Hybrid leadership in education: Conceptual and empirical challenges [Electronic resuorse] // Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 2020. Vol. 48, No. 1. P. 6-20. URL: scispace.com. (date of access: 21.04.2025).
23. Harris A., Jones M. COVID-19, school leadership, and hybrid management // School Leadership & Management. 2020. Vol. 40, No. 4. P. 363-377. DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479.
24. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education / Zawacki-Richter O. [et al.] // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 16, No. 1. P. 39. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
25. Bates A.W. Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning [Electronic resuorse]. URL: https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/7063/5857 (date of access: 21.04.2025).
26. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. ISBN 1578512506, 9781578512508.
27. Garrison D.R., Kanuka H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001.
28. Mintzberg H. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice-Hall, 1983. 312 p. ISBN 100138543496.
Review
For citations:
Zarubin V.I., Andreeva I.V. Integrated process-project model of functioning of a secondary comprehensive educational organization. Vestnik Majkopskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tehnologiceskogo Universiteta. 2025;(2):81-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47370/2078-1024-2025-17-2-81-98
Views:
11
Email this article 