The role of public control in creating the confidence of the government in the society
https://doi.org/10.47370/2078-1024-2025-17-4-145-161
Abstract
Introduction. The importance of public oversight in creating confidence of the government in society is linked to the importance of democratic principles, increased transparency in government activities, and the need to consider citizens' interests in decision-making. Public oversight mechanisms and the activities of public committees play a key role in building a constructive dialogue between government agencies and citizens. These institutions serve as a bridge, enabling the assessment of the effectiveness of decisions made at the local level and identifying the most pressing issues of public concern. Thanks to the work of public committees, it is possible not only to identify existing problems but also to develop specific proposals for their resolution, which ultimately leads to improved public administration. Public oversight contributes to increased public trust in government activities and ensures close interaction between the government and civil society institutions.
The materials and methods. The methodological basis of the research is a systems approach and general methods of scientific inquiry, such as analysis, synthesis, and generalization.
The research results. The research results have shown that public oversight is implemented through the following main forms: public monitoring of government activities, public audits, public expert review, and other forms of interaction with government agencies. It has been established that public oversight has a significant impact on the public administration system by increasing civic engagement, ensuring transparency of government activities, protecting citizens' legitimate interests, combating corruption, and improving the quality of public administration.
Discussion and сonclusion. The practical significance of the research lies in its potential use in improving the regulatory framework, developing civil society institutions, establishing mechanisms for interaction between government and society, and training public administration specialists. Recommendations based on the research findings include strengthening legal protection for public oversight entities, expanding the range of public oversight forms, implementing modern digital technologies, developing a system for motivating citizen participation, and creating a unified information platform for public oversight. The study confirms that developing public oversight mechanisms is essential for building an open state that fosters lasting trust between government and society. The further development of this institution must take into account the contemporary challenges and opportunities of digitalization, while preserving the fundamental principles of democracy and civil society.
About the Author
K. Ya. LitvinaРоссия
Kristina Ya. Litvina, PhD (Econ.), Associate Professor, the Department of Sectoral Economics and Finance at the Institute of Economics and Management
191186, the Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg, 48 Moika River Emb
References
1. Bikmurzina, R.R. Civil society institutions and regional public control over government bodies // Young Scientist. 2023. Issue 50 (497). P. 367-370. EDN: IDXNIY. [In Russ.]
2. Grib V.V. Legal development of public control in education and science // State power and local self-government. 2021. Issue 4. P. 3-8. DOI: 10.18572/1813-1247-2021-4-3-8 EDN: GUGLHH. [In Russ.]
3. Zubarev, S.M. Concept and essence of public control over the activities of government bodies // Administrative law and process. 2011. No. 5. P. 11-12. EDN: NULGJF. [In Russ.]
4. On state control (supervision) and municipal control in the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]: the Federal Law of the Russian Federation of July 31, 2020 No. 248-FZ (as amended on December 28, 2024 No. 540-FZ) // Information and legal system «ConsultantPlus». URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_358750/. [In Russ.]
5. On the fundamentals of public control in the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]: Federal Law of the Russian Federation of June 21, 2014 No. 212-FZ (as amended on December 25, 2023 No. 683-FZ) // Information and Legal System «ConsultantPlus» URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_165809/. [In Russ.]
6. Ogneva E.A. Public control as a factor in the development of civil society // Bulletin of Tula State University. Humanities. 2019. Issue 2. P. 51-62. [In Russ.]
7. Pavlushkov, A.R. Public monitoring commission of the subjects of the Russian Federation: current issues and problems of organizing activities // Union of criminalists and criminologists. 2022. Isue 1. P. 100-106. DOI: 10.31085/2310-8681-2022-1-192-100-106 EDN: PPCZON. [In Russ.]
8. Petrakova, A.S., Levchenko, E.A., Maslova, A.V. Implementation of the state control function in the unity of state, municipal, and public control: theoretical and legal aspect // Agrarian and Land Law. 2025. Issue 3. P. 113-115. DOI: 10.47643/1815-1329_2025_3_113 EDN: BYYLEA. [In Russ.]
9. Chebotareva, I.Yu., Solovieva, S.V. Legal content and mechanism for implementing public oversight in public administration bodies // Law and Practice. 2020. Issue 3. P. 68-72. EDN: PFMDAF.
10. Litvina, K. Ya. Modern concept of building trust in society // Bulletin of the South-Russian State Technical University (NPI). Series: Social and Economic Sciences. 2024. Vol. 17. Issue 2. P. 51-58. DOI 10.17213/2075-2067-2024-2-51-58. – EDN ZJQCQG. [In Russ.]
11. Grosheva, I.A. Public oversight of law enforcement agencies: the problem of building trust // Bulletin of the Tyumen Institute for Advanced Training of Employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2015. Issue 1(4). P. 159-163. EDN UBMKXN. [In Russ.]
12. Guzeeva, I.N. Public control – independent experts or a new strategy for increasing trust in elections // Bulletin of the Eurasian Academy of Administrative Sciences. 2021. Issue 3(56). P. 54-57. EDN GDPXHE. [In Russ.]
13. Murygina, M.V. Public control and political trust as a subject of analysis // Young Scientist. 2017. Issue 14(148). P. 575-577. EDN YJWSDD. [In Russ.]
14. Makarova, O.V. Public control over compliance with the openness of information on the activities of public authority // Journal of the Russian Law. 2017. Issue 7(247). P. 54-62. DOI 10.12737/article_59522f98182b24.90800220. EDN ZBPWPL. [In Russ.]
15. Gavrilin, S.A. Social control, public trust and support in the system of relations between the internal affairs bodies and society // Scientific Bulletin of the Oryol Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.V. Lukyanov. 2018. Issue 4(77). P. 41-44. EDN YPOFQT. [In Russ.]
16. Litvina, K.Ya. Genesis of the development of the category of trust and distrust in science // Bulletin of the Maikop State Technological University. 2024. Vol. 16, Issue 2. P. 173-180. DOI 10.47370/2078-1024-2024-16-2-173-180. – EDN VNNKTO. [In Russ.]
17. Report of the Public Chamber of Russia on the state of civil society in the Russian Federation in 2024. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://report2024.oprf.ru/ru-RU/2024-the-main-thing-in-russiancivil-society.html. [In Russ.]
18. Research by the Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge at the National Research University Higher School of Economics on the topic «Business Development on Digital Platforms» [Electronic resource]. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/820948305.pdf. [In Russ.]
Review
For citations:
Litvina K.Ya. The role of public control in creating the confidence of the government in the society. Vestnik Majkopskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tehnologiceskogo Universiteta. 2025;17(4):145-161. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47370/2078-1024-2025-17-4-145-161
JATS XML













